| |
Israel and the issues of arms control
and regional security arrangements
Conceptual issues in the nuclear domain have already been discussed
in the multilateral Arms Control and Regional Security (ACRS) working
group that met between 1992 and 1995. There, Israel made clear what
it had declared a decade earlier - that its long-term vision is
identical to that of its allies: making the Middle East free of
all types of non-conventional weapons, in the belief that this will
be made possible once comprehensive peace relations prevail among
all the countries of the region.
Israel's agreement to the idea of a regional security dialogue,
parallel with the peace process, can also be found in the guidelines
of the Road
Map: In the second phase of the Road Map the five multilateral
tracks are to be restarted, among them arms control and regional
security. Egypt caused the suspension of these tracks. Yet, if the
Road Map, which enjoys broad international legitimacy, were to be
implemented, then later on the multilateral tracks will also be
advanced, among them arms control and regional security.
It is true that Israel's security environment has improved in the
past few years, particularly after the destruction of Saddam Hussein's
arsenal of Scud missiles and other weapons and the fall of his regime.
In addition, after the Libyan government was caught attempting to
import components for the production of enriched uranium, it relinquished
major WMD-related
components, including chemical weapons materials. This is another
direct benefit of the Iraq War.
The threat of massive conventional attacks against Israel has also
diminished with the end of the Cold War and the parallel decline
of Syrian and other forces that had been aligned with the Soviet
Union.
However, the fundamental asymmetry that has always characterized
Israel's strategic position in the Middle East remains unchanged.
In the regional turbulence which has increased as a result of the
war in Iraq, Israel's miniscule territorial size and small population
could present an irresistible target of opportunity for yet another
Arab leader seeking to divert attention from internal pressures.
From this perspective, Israel's nuclear deterrent option is given
credit for preventing catastrophic miscalculation, even in the case
of Saddam Hussein. Israel is not going to be destroyed, and the
only rational alternative is mutual acceptance.
|